The Engineering of Consent
Although we describe Freud as having
popularised the unconscious, he did little in the way of self-promotion,
other than setting up some poorly attended evening meetings in
Vienna and publishing some rather difficult papers.
His ideas did, however, gain huge popularity. Freud hated America,
calling it a ‘gigantic mistake’, but America loved Freud. He was invited
to receive an honorary degree from Clark University in Massachusetts;
and in 1911 the Psychoanalytic Society of New York was founded. It
became fashionable for writers, artists, and producers to undergo
analysis themselves, and soon people were reading about the unconscious
in novels, watching movies influenced by Freudian ideas, and
gradually integrating the concepts into everyday life.
How could an academic with such difficult and controversial ideas
win over a country in such a major way? Part of the answer is to be
found in the extraordinary story of Edward Bernays, Freud’s nephew.
Born in Austria, he moved to New York and developed a career as a
press agent for visiting show business celebrities. He joined the propaganda
arm of the US war effort in the First World War. It turns out that
Bernays played a pivotal role (with Freud’s daughter, Anna) in introducing
Freudian ideas to US politicians, policy makers, leaders of industry
and marketers.
In return for a gift of cigars, Freud had sent his nephew one of his
books. The result was that Bernays used Freud’s insights to turn ‘propaganda’
(discredited after the war as dishonest and exploitative) into
the new profession of ‘public relations’. A key feature of this new activity
was that public relations was largely invisible to those being influenced
by it, and aimed to control public opinion by manipulating
unconscious desires.
American politicians and planners were aware of Freud’s ideas about
the power of the primeval unconscious urges, and believed that these
had manifested in the brutality of Nazi Germany. They were concerned
that the melting pot of the USA could contain similar dangers and felt
that they could try to control this hidden enemy by diverting these
urges into the acquisition of consumer goods. They believed this was
the best way of maintaining democracy - and it had the happy by-product
of driving the expanding economy. Bernays worked closely with
politicians and corporations to develop what he called "the engineering
of consent" - controlling the minds of the public without their
awareness.
He suggested that "those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of
society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling
power of our country. In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in
the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical
thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of
persons ... who pull the wires which control the public mind."
Ironically, Freud’s work was aimed at bringing hidden motives to consciousness
to help people lead happier lives - while Bernays used the
same set of theories to mask the motives of his clients and keep the
public unconscious of the forces that were being used to mould their
minds and desires.
Bernays was instrumental in developing the notion of the consumer
as somebody who bought a product not because they needed it, but
because they would feel better if they had it. He realised that anyone
who wanted to influence the public had to appeal to people’s irrational
and selfish needs, and he systematically linked mass-produced goods to
unconscious desires. He helped develop ‘self-expression’ from a psychoanalytic
method of healing to a cultural method of living.
Bernays - or the Father of Spin, as he is now
known - used Freudian
insights to plan groundbreaking marketing campaigns and publicity
stunts. He was largely responsible for making it socially acceptable for
women to smoke (to his later regret). He was widely recognised as a talented
and influential PR man, working for Procter & Gamble, General
Motors, General Electric, and for Eisenhower,
Thomas Edison and Eleanor Roosevelt.
But things began to change. Psychoanalysis was
falling out of favour and, by the 1960s, several new
psychologies had been developed. These either
rebelled against Freud, or emphasised the
Humanistic approach to personal development. The
new thinking said that the inner self did not need to
be repressed and controlled - rather, it should be
encouraged to express itself.
This was the rise of the ‘me’ generation. Where
would this leave the newly emerged PR and marketing?
Rather than proving a threat, these ideas were
seized upon as opportunities to sell to the public ways
of expressing their newfound individuality. It was now
less about appealing to the hidden desires and more
about using products as symbols of the self.
While many other factors were also important in
developing today’s consumer society, Bernays - harnessing
ideas about the unconscious - was part of a
process that has led to brands being integrated into
our self-concept. Today, we accept that people
define themselves by what they buy and use, and
their relationships with brands are the subject of
much of our research.

This page excerpted from Confronting the Unconscious by qualitative researcher, Joanna Chrzanowska.