The Deception of One-Worldism: Part 1

by Bobby Garner
June 10, 2004

This is the first of a multi-part series of articles in which I will summerize my research on the phenomenon of One-Worldism commonly known as the New World Order. I make the distinction of terms because there is evidence which suggests that New World Order as typically understood to be the United Nations may be inadequate to describe the true geo-political picture. The New World Order and the United Nations are not necessarily synonymous. All material used in this research will be listed on my "Research on the Factions of One-Worldism" page.

"What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea—a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children's future." - George H. W. Bush's State of the Union Address, Envisioning One Thousand Points of Light, Given on Tuesday, January 29, 1991

Esoterically speaking, a point of contact, a moment of "spiritual intercourse," is imminent, and out of that moment a new world can be born. ...I seek to emphasize the point that the final activity which will bring about this spiritual event must come from the outer plane of physical life. All of us who are occupied with the Plan for "the next three years" are seeking earnestly for those who can help us and to whom appeal can be made for the putting forth of that final last effort which will bring the desired and anticipated result. — Alice Bailey, The Externalization of the Hierarchy, The Present Urgency, 1934

"The New World Order as envisioned by the Elite is hardly a recent undertaking. Their's is a philosophy rooted in ancient occult traditions. Success is near, and the infiltration of society by New Age occultism is the reason for this success. The New World Order has never been solely about world government, rather, from the beginning its proponents have been privy to secret doctrines and it is a spiritual plan more than anything." New World Order or Occult Secret Destiny?, The New Age Movement and Service to The Plan

"Today, there is a struggle being waged between two competing visions of a New World Order. The Eastern vision would consist of a world effectively dominated by the Sino-Russian axis of nations. The other is a one-world government dominated by the Western powers now being promoted by the Bush Administration, which is staffed by hundreds of members of the one-world government promoting Council on Foreign Relations from the President's top advisors on down. Both visions would establish a world government that would be largely socialist in nature." - The Coming New World Order-Whose Vision Will Prevail?, David T. Pyne, Esq., Columnist and Legal Analyst, August 1, 2002

"The Pope called last month for the reform of world institutions and deplored any failure to respect international law. But in a sermon during a mass at St Peter's in Rome yesterday, he went much further, referring to the UN as if it were already a part of the past. ... [T]he central issue, seen from the Vatican's point of view, is the growing irrelevance of a painstakingly constructed body of international law which is being ignored by the US administration during its "war on terror"."  Pope calls for a new world order

"It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things." - Niccolo Machiavelli

We are going to have a New World Order. Whether we like it or not, it's coming so we may as well get used to that fact. The only question now is; Which one will it be? Whose world view will prevail, and who will control it? First we must identify the options and make a decision as to which one we want to support, because when it's over, world government will not tolerate any opponents.

As most people see it, there are only two possibilities, accept the NWO, or oppose it with all the military force that can be mustered. Considering the slaughter which that would likely entail, we are left with the only real choice as the lessor of two evils. Isn't it odd that many have expressed the opinion that "the lessor of two evils" is still evil, and yet most decisions are presented to us just that way? Do you think there might be a reason for that? Is it possible that this is the essence of "Controlled Opposition"? Is controlled opposition working at every level of society to head off all resistance to the New World Order? Are we really limited to the lessor of two evils, or is this a disinformation ploy to draw our attention away from the real choice?

U. S. National security expert David T. Pyne, who works as an International Programs Manager in the Department of the Army, wrote in August 2002:

" Of course, there is one other possible outcome, which is that both visions of a New World Order will fail. A triumph for the cause of freedom, independence and national sovereignty in the US can be made possible only if concerned Americans unite to defeat globalist politicians and elect conservative visionaries who will put America's interests first for a change and keep her defenses strong. This will require the withdrawal of the US of the United Nations and other anti-American globalist institutions." - The Coming New World Order-Whose Vision Will Prevail?

Am I missing something here or what? Isn't this the same recipe of the current Bush administration? Don't we already have "conservative visionaries" in control of government? This is nothing but doubletalk of a world situation no better that the one it would replace, in that it has all the same mechanisms for failure built in. It basically means a return to the Cold War, and the concept of containment, or MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction). It appears that if the American version of the NWO fails, they want to reset the clock for another shot at it later. I doubt if anyone really has the stomach for a repeat of the last half of the twentieth century. So, this is not a satisfactory solution from the perspective of the people.

From September 11, 2001 and subsequent coverup, to Iraq 2004, the whole world hates what the U.S. government is doing, including a large portion of it's own population. Yet it is being touted by some as the only alternative to the New World Order. This is a false notion, and can be accredited to nothing short of sheer stubbornness mixed with a fair portion of pure ignorance (a product of deception), because we still get world government, but there is a better choice.

Many people are coming to hate what is called the New World Order. Yet they find themselves powerless to intervene against it. When the Almighty God not only foretells this eventuality, but expresses the same hatred for it, and promises to intervene on our behalf, the same people like to accuse him of being angry, hateful, vengeful, and bloodthirsty. They are like the children in an example offered by Jesus; "But to what shall I compare this generation? It is like little children sitting in the markets, and calling to their mates, and saying, We piped to you, and you did not dance; we mourned to you, and you did not wail." Matthew 11: 16,17. Such people, cannot be pleased, and whether or not they realize it, they are making their choice against the only really credible solution available.

Yes, the Bible does offer another alternative form of world government:

Psalms Chapter 2

"Why have the nations raged and the peoples are meditating on vanity? The kings of the earth set themselves; yea, the rulers have plotted together against Jehovah and His Anointed, saying, We will break their bands in two, and throw off their cords from us. He who sits in the heavens shall laugh; the Lord shall mock at them. Then He will speak to them in His anger, and He will terrify them in His wrath; Yea, I have set My king on My holy mount on Zion.

I will declare concerning the statute of Jehovah: He said to Me, You are My Son. Today I have begotten You. Ask of Me, and I will give the nations as Your inheritance; and the uttermost parts of the earth as Your possession. You shall break them with a rod of iron; You shall dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.

Now, then, be wise, O kings; be taught, O judges of the earth: Serve Jehovah with fear; yea, rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest He be angry, and you perish from the way, when His wrath is kindled but a little. Oh the blessings of all those who flee to Him for refuge!"

Don't confuse the use of the word "Zion" as used here with the Zionist state of modern Israel, because this prophecy has no relevance to Zionism or Israel. God rejected Israel as a favored nation no later than 70 AD when Jerusalam was destroyed by Rome with the remaining inhabitants led away captive, because they had rejected Jesus as the Messiah. With the lose of the Temple, it became literally impossible to abide by the Law of Moses, and to the dismay of those who failed to grasp the significance of that fact, it ceased to function as a legally binding authority on anyone. The Bible makes no mention of rebuilding that Temple ever again on the "Holy Mount" as many Christians believe they must.

I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but I do know certain things which on their face, appear to be quite conspiratorial. However, I prefer Lyndon LaRouche's explanation; "It's not a conspiracy, it's a plan". What is the plan? "They are introducing chaos". By working at the very roots of the social order, they have induced social disorder, or "Social Disorganization", from the individual, to family, to local and national governments, and the world. I have a book by that title which was first published in 1934, while mine is a second print edition dated 1941. It outlines in great detail, the precise steps, to be taken in breaking down any existing social order at all levels. It offers an analysis of the Hegelian Dialectic as modified by Marx, and admits it's usefulness for effecting social change. The purported purpose of the book is to advance understanding of the construction of social order, but it does not require a very sagacious person to understand the implications for inducing social change through what we now know as "Social Engineering". There can be little doubt that this book and others like it were used to plant the seeds of change, which later grew to maturity among that generation of university students who gained control of the campus curriculum through which the social unrest of the following decades was unleashed. In retrospect, it is now obvious that those changes have cleared the way for the synthesis of a New World Order.

The Present Situation

At the present time in mid 2004, there are clearly two main political forces operating worldwide. They first became evident with the events leading into the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. They are the Free Trade/IMF/WTO/Anglo-American Empire, and their "Coalition of the Willing" on the one hand (the true Globalist' perhaps), and virtually the rest of the world, mostly nationalist countries represented primarily through the United Nations on the other. Many people have come to view this conflict between these two powers as a behind the scenes battle for world domination.

There is good reason for that. The Anglo-American position under the leadership of the Bush/Chenny administration, according to the Executive Intelligence Review, is apparently driven by the concepts outlined by Samuel B. Huntington in his "Clash of Civilizations" war, which is basically a war against Islam. But the objective is to gain strategic advantage in the Middle East in part to contain the awakening military giant of China, but more importantly, the economic power block being formed between China, Russia, France, Germany, and India most notably, but also many nations of the far east who are interested in developing an effective alternative to the IMF/WTO dominated global free trade economy. The Eurasian Land Bridge is a key part of this development, and that's why it is so opposed by the west. The recent rail way explosion in North Korea must be seen as an element of this opposition. Joe Vaills has written an excellent analysis of what happened there.

The U.N. side of this mostly behind the scenes conflict is widely recognized as the "New World Order" stemming from President George H.W. Bush's comments in 1991 as preparations were being made for the first gulf war, Desert Storm. The Anglo-American side, by virtue of their break with the U.N. approach to the Iraq issue in 2003, is being seen as the chief opponent of the New World Order. These viewpoints are dead wrong, simply because of the clear contradictions which they impose. Most notable of those contradictions is the fact that the Anglo-American position, when extended to it's logical limit, is seeking to establish itself as an undisputed hegemonious global military and economic Empire, a truly "New World Order" by any reasonable analysis. This in spite of the fact that the U.S. has been the major champion of the U.N. since it's inception in 1945. Further, we know that the core elements of the NWO agenda have been implemented by U.N. member nations following U.N, mandates, including the U.S.

This apparent contradiction has led some to allege that the Bush family has never truly supported the NWO, but instead were working some kind of plan to set it up to fail. This viewpoint is only partially correct, as I will explain later. The true solution to the paradox is that which accounts for all the apparent contradictions.

The challenge then, is to find a solution to the paradox contained in this riddle. Why did the US work so hard toward implementing the United Nations agenda, and then suddenly act so contrary to is ideals by waging aggressive war against Iraq? Is this just party politics or is there something much deeper going on?

Well, what is the roll of the UN if it isn't to be the center of power in the New World Order? What if the United Nations were nothing less than a very expensive controlled opposition, a decoy if you will, to keep our attention diverted these past 60 years, as the western powers built the infrastructure of World Empire. What if the UN were only an image of the real NWO, one which could easily be dismantled after it had served it's purpose.

May I submit that this is exactly what is happening right before the eyes of the world? In the Bible book of Revelation, John saw in vision what appeared to be three frogs coming from the mouth of three beasts."And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are spirits of demons doing signs, which go forth to the kings of the earth, even of the whole habitable world to assemble them to the war of that day, the great day of God Almighty." (Revelation 16: 13,14). Without getting into a sticky debate over who the three beasts represent, just reflect for a moment on recent historical events which precipitated the highest ever degree of cooperation between UN member nations.

At a meeting of the UN General Assembly in 1987, Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze spoke of the need for the nations to give up a portion of their sovereignty and come together under the auspices of the United Nations out of concerns for the environment. According to Shevardnadze, it was a matter of "our survival". A short time later the Russians put their money where their mouth was, and disbanded the Soviet Union. Then at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit the former Russian leader took center stage as he was appointed to head up the UN environmental program known as Agenda 21. That program also known as Sustainable Development, and also Local Agenda 21, is currently being implemented in nearly every nation, including the United States of America. Are the nations pulling together in preparation for the great war? Are frogs not green? Isn't Kermit the (it isn't easy being green) frog the mascot of the environmental movement? Larry Abrams, in his book, "The Greening ", shows that virtually every former communist/socialist movement around the world suddenly turned green about the same time. Writing the introduction, W.W. "Chip" Wood comments, "Earth Day 1990 dominated the media like no event since the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor. It seems likely that more Hollywood stars and MTV celebrities joined the "save the earth" crusade than opposed the Nazis in World War II". Is this all just coincidence, or is there something about this "Green Revolution" which bears looking into in view of this prophecy?

Stay tuned, we will address that question in Part 2

This series of articles is the result of my research work on One-Worldism

Bobby Garner is a researcher on the phenomenon of One-Worldism with an emphasis on the methods and techniques employed in it's attendant deception without which the New World Order cannot happen. He may be reached via E-mail at bobby@congregator.net. He welcomes your comments. Visit his website www.congregator.net This article my be posted in it's entirety on any website provided this statement remains attached.