Climategate and the Dialectic
E-mail from Bobby Garner to subscriber list
December 1, 2009
Some of my earliest research led me to discover the LaRouche
organization and his weekly magazine, Executive Intelligence Review.
I was intrigued by his brief comment on a radio interview in 1994 in
answer to the question: "Well, if it isn't a conspiracy, then what is
it?" His answer without elaboration: "It's a Plan".
That was the defining moment that marked the beginning of my dedicated
effort to discover exactly what "the Plan" was, where did it come from,
and who was involved in formulating it. We now know the answers to all
of those questions and much more.
The plan is the end of manmade government organization
including the
UN, and the enthronement of their global ruler Lucifer, aka, Satan,
aka, the Devil, aka Serpent, aka Dragon, "father of the lie",
manslayer,
and many other notorious names. All those characteristics will be
needed in their brand of sustainability where their "creation"
counterfeit, "survival of the fittest" will be strictly enforced. No
"useless eater" will be tolerated. The weak, the under performing,
along with
the suffering and dying will be put out of their misery. - my comment
on Crashing
the System
That was written in 2005, and we have since discovered information
about the New Age Movement, the Technological Singularity, "Personal
& Planetary Transformation", Transtopian Transhumanism,
Transcendence, Globalism, a new One World Order, the Kingdom Identity
Movement, Global Oneness, and many other things and I have shown them
all to be connected to The Plan. The issues have changed, but
The Plan keeps on advancing. Contrary to LaRouche's statement, The Plan
is the final chapter of a multi-millennial Master
Conspiracy. UN/Local
Agenda 21 provides the specifications for fully
realizing/materializing The Plan.
Now we have Climategate to distract us from the efforts to reach a
political/financial solution for Global Warming next month in
Copenhagen. Regardless of the outcome, we the people are set up to
loose. Executive Intelligence Review made the following press release
on November 27, 2009:
The Birth of the 'Global Warming' Hoax
Nov. 27, 2009 (EIRNS)—EIR published in its June 8, 2007 issue,
this groundbreaking
article
exposing how the fraudulent "global warming" propaganda drive, now
causing such an uproar around the Copenhagen Summit, was initiated by
Malthusian fanatics. The article revealed the stated intention of these
fanatics: to prevent Third World development, because, they claimed,
the additional people this development would produce, would pose a
threat to the environment. A PDF version of this article, suitable for
printing, can be seen
here.
That "groundbreaking article" makes a very well documented case for
when, where and by whom, the Global Warming Hoax was perpetrated. It is
based on the flat-earth - limited resource - ideology which was an
invention of British
East India Company's Parson
Thomas Malthus (1766-1834). Malthus argued that population
increases geometrically while food supply increases arithmetically,
meaning (if true) that food production cannot keep pace with population
growth. I strongly encourage you to download and study it carefully.
LaRouche on the other hand argues that Man, being a special creation
with cognitive functions unique to mankind, has the capacity to
increase his relative population density per square kilometer through
technological advances such as those associated with the period from
the Golden Renaissance through the modern industrial revolution. On the
Development of Man, LaRouche observes:
Those
advances in cultural development of the individual and the population,
which make possible both the maintenance and the increase of the
productive powers of human labor, reflect the essential difference
which sets the human individual, apart from, and above all beasts. It
is the cultural development of the physical-creative potential of the
individual, that as much through Classical culture (rather than today's
relatively depraved popular cultures) which defines that quality of
development and expression of the human individual on which both the
maintenance and the increase of the potential relative population
density of the human species depends.
A zero-technological growth economy is already the economy of a dying,
ultimately doomed culture....
- A
Queen in Check!
So LaRouche holds out a promising alternative to population
reduction (the objective of the Global Warming Hoax), but think twice
before hitching a ride on the LaRouche train. What is the opposite of "zero-technological
growth"? Recall the Technological
Singularity? The Technological Singularity is part of the
Transtopian ideology which is Post-Humanism where Man ascends to become
One with the Super Intelligence, a combination of man-machine. (see New
Age Humanism and the "End of Flesh" (Mankind)
I'm not suggesting that LaRouche believes in, or is in pursuit of
the Technological Singularity, but he does believe that progress in
real science and technology will inevitably lead to the colonization of
other planets and therefore boundless opportunities for an ever
increasing human population. While LaRouche believes man will colonize
other planets using as yet undiscovered technologies, the New Age
generally believes they will go there as if on a magic carpet.
Otherwise, there is no difference.
The author concludes the article on the1975
'Endangered Atmosphere' Conference with a dialectical choice for
the participants in the debate on Global Warming.
In
the intervening 32 years, most of our scientific institutions have been
taken over by an anti-science ideology, typified by the views of a
Stephen Schneider or a John Holdren. How can there be a science when
the mind and its capacity for creativity is denied, when man is put
equal to beast, and when man's advancements are perceived as ruining
the pristine confines of a limited world? Such pessimism is a formula
for a "no future" world.
The
question remains, will the reservoir of sanity, in particular in
today's youth, who did not live through the greenwashing of the 1970s
and 1980s, be able to force reality—climate reality and financial
reality—on the rest of the population? Will the Noösphere, man's
creative ability to change the Biosphere, prevail?
A dialectical argument is presented for one reason, and that is to
operate a pincer
movement wherein two options are offered, and making one of them
look so bad that people will run headlong into the other.
Note that the ultimate consequences will be the same for
each choice. They are two roads to the same destination.
Those who oppose the New Age Noösphere opt for the Global Warming
ideology, and those who oppose Global Warming choose the Noösphere as
the only other apparent option.
Climategate may have been engineered to drive the United Nations
Climate Conference in Copenhagen into the waiting arms of the Noösphere
option.
However, regardless of the outcome of the upcoming Climate Conference,
whether a "no future" world, or the Noösphere is chosen, the intent is
to move society on toward the Transcendence,
the forth and final phase of the Dialectic Tetrad.
Bobby Garner
http://www.congregator.net/
< Previous — E-mail Index — Next >
none
|