The Global Warming Game No Longer Justifiable

E-mail from Bobby Garner to subscriber list
November 25, 2009

Read Comments...

You have heard the news of the release of e-mails from the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia. The influential CRU claims the world's largest temperature data set, and its work and mathematical models were incorporated into the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) who's reports on Climate Change since 1992 have guided all world government's policy for meeting the dangers of Global Warming.

A few weeks ago, I wrote in "Intellectual Technology and Game Theory In Perspective" (new comments added) in regard to "Reference Framing:

All frames of reference rest upon certain hypotheses, postulates and a priori assertions, assumptions and beliefs. The degree to which those hypotheses, postulates and, assertions are true defines the range of validity for every frame of reference. Each of those hypotheses, postulates and a priori assertions must be preserved if the frame of reference is to be maintained. The point at which they break down is where a particular frame of reference becomes ineffective and invalid. Therefore, by tampering with the hypotheses, postulates and a priori assertions, the reference frame may be shifted in any direction. Public Polling and so called "Scientific Studies" in combination with an effective propaganda machine, are hugely effective in disturbing the underlying hypotheses, postulates and assertions which demand a shift in the points of reference. All of the big issues of the day from feminism to gay rights to climate change and dozens more are all examples of a shifting social frame of reference. Each of them is the product of a winning game strategy devised by the global strategists.

Global Warming is an application of Game Theory defining a reference frame based on specific hypotheses, postulates, a priori assertions, assumptions and beliefs. Their basis in truth "defines the range of validity" for the "game" known as Global Warming.

Speaking of the validity, the hypotheses, postulates, a priori assertions, assumptions and beliefs supporting Global Warming have suddenly come under intense scrutiny. There are two possible scenarios regarding the public disclosure of some 3,600 e-mail messages from the archives of the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in England.

1. The e-mails were stolen by a hacker and published for the purpose of undermining the hypotheses, postulates, a priori assertions, assumptions and beliefs which support the Global Warming Game just as the "effective propaganda machine" claims.

or...

2. The e-mails were leaked to an "effective propaganda machine" by  the game player's themselves for the purpose of shifting the "frame of reference" to induce a new public opinion of the game called Global Warming.

You will recognize the first of course as the official story published by the "effective propaganda machine" (the Internet), but that's precisely why we should question it and consider the possibility or probability that the second one may be the real reason.

So why would the game players wish to induce a major shift the public's perspective view of Global Warming?

  Among the possible reasons are...:

1. Global Warming has not achieved the expected result, or has fail to achieve it within the needed time frame. Time is of the essence and it's getting short according to some World Servers of the Plan focused on the Venus Transit and 2012.
2. Another reason could be related to the sluggish return of sunspot cycle 24 and the predictions of a very weak cycle.
3. Another possibility could relate to the banking crisis and a collapsing global economy.
4. Or it could be all of the above.
   

There are plenty of reasons why Global Warming is no longer justifiable by the game players. It is very probable that Gore's green alliance with venture capital" came as it did in November of 2007 at the very bottom of the last sunspot cycle in order to realize the maximum benefit of the usual warming trend associated with increased sunspot activity as we entered the next cycle. At that time the projected peak of sunspot cycle 24 would fall in mid 2013. That projection has now necessarily been delayed by at least two years: " The sun is in the pits of a century-class solar minimum, and sunspots have been puzzlingly scarce for more than two years.". Adding to that disappointment, is the revised predictions for one of the weakest cycles in memory. With all of that development, we can add the effects of the lingering banking and financial crisis which most certainly poses a serious threat to the budding Green Economy which once held the promise of obscene profits for Gore's Green alliance of venture capitalists. In a Huffington Post article posted by Al Gore on July 17, 2008,  he wrote:

"I don't remember a time in our country when so many things seemed to be going so wrong simultaneously. Our economy is in terrible shape and getting worse, gasoline prices are increasing dramatically, and so are electricity rates. Jobs are being outsourced. Home mortgages are in trouble. Banks, automobile companies and other institutions we depend upon are under growing pressure. Distinguished senior business leaders are telling us that this is just the beginning unless we find the courage to make some major changes quickly....
- Al Gore's Progress Report On the Antithesis To the Communitarian Synthesis

In addition to all of those problems, some of the released messages indicate possibly insurmountable problems with the data manipulation/modeling software programs in use by the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. See  Congress May Probe Leaked Global Warming E-Mails. Scroll down to the message by Harry Harris.

It's been a long time since we've seen such a well coordinated effort to ditch a failed policy, but I believe the evidence supports that conclusion. I have always believed that the NWO would come on the heels of a rapid succession of catastrophic events which would allow no other options. Events which could be manipulated to focus on the precise time when The Plan is finally realized. Several people whom I consider credible due to their positions in the movement, sincerely believe that the opportune time for the transition will be like a window which will be open for a period of time before it closes, not to open again for thousands of years. According to many of those sources, we are presently within that window of opportunity.

Many believe that the title of the defining document, UN/Local Agenda 21 implies the year 2021 as the latest possible date to have realized the Brave New World. If September 11, 2001 marked the opening of the window (as I believe it does), and 2021 marks the close, then we are approaching the very center where the odds of success are at their maximum. I have documented this window of opportunity on my Gateway To America's Destiny page.

I have updated a page containing some older information on A Major Deception on Global Warming.

Bobby Garner

< Previous — E-mail Index — Next >

Comments:

From Doug at DougBuchanan.Com
November 25, 2009

While the "global warming" game players, and analyzers of the game players, have been playing their game for no utility of thinking humans, at cost of their time, those who ask questions of controlling concepts, simply asked the following questions, at the outset of the game, and turned back to having fun advancing their knowledge, and laughing robustly...

For water volume/area calculation alone, not the inconsequential thermal expansion, unloaded land rebound, increased surface area per increment of rise, etceteras....

Who, with their name for public consideration of their credibility, can provide the available and verifiable numbers for the following...

1.  Total Antarctica, non floating, above sea level ice volume, as an interesting part of the below.
    (melted floating ice does not add to the water level in a container)
2.  Total Greenland, non floating, above sea level ice volume, as an interesting part of the below.
3.  Total world (including Antarctica and Greenland) non-floating, above sea level ice volume.
4.  Ratio of glacier ice volume to its melted water volume.
5.  Surface area of all ocean water.
6.  Ocean rise in inches or feet resulting from complete global melting of all ice, calculated from the above.

Why will no global warming scientist or institution provide those readily available numbers, for easy verification and determination of the credibility of said scientist or institution?

9 inches.

The many, dramatic, periodic, abrupt rises and falls of average global surface temperature, long predates humans.

Global warming benefits humans.

Be concerned with global cooling.  It does not benefit humans.  And it is next.

Adapt.

DougBuchanan.com

From Alma

November 25, 2009

The biggest problem with this is that ALL changes on Earth are caused by energies that cannot be stopped and are affecting all bodies in the solar system. The best data comes from the Russians. The powers that be know full well they cannot do anything about it. They have their head inside the sand and will not take it out. Humans are waking up and critical mass is not that many humans.
Alma

Posted by Bobby

November 28, 2009

In light of more recent developments, I wish to clarify my position on the Global Warming Game. The title "Global Warming Game No Longer Justifiable" suggests that the game is ending, and I stand by that. That doesn't mean that the strategists are backing down however, or that Global Warming won't be treated as a fact. What it does mean is that the strategy of the "Game", i.e. the scientific argument is ending for all the reasons mentioned earlier. The public debate concerning Global Warming is over. The new strategy is to move Global Warming to the political arena where votes and influence can be coerced or purchased for a price.

Observe that the game strategists are completely unabashed by the public perception of the email leak. The news yesterday (Nov. 27th) was about the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM). It's publicized as an "important springboard" to an international deal on global warming. Today the word is that...

"Hopes for a new global climate pact have risen after rich nations at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Trinidad and Tobago offered to help poorer countries bear the costs of implementing any deal." - The Telegraph

The email leak does two very important things. 1. It was a bold signal to all game players that the science argument/debate was over. 2. It grabs and distracts the public attention at a crucial time just before the big summit in Copenhagen.

It appears that they conceded the scientific argument in favor of a political solution which they will purchase in the usual fashion.

The United Nations secretary-general Ban Ki-moon, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen joined 53 Commonwealth leaders to work on the issue of climate change
- http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/28/2756422.htm

This further illustrates how the British Commonwealth of Nations (United Kingdom) is the real global political power working through the United Nations.

And a word for the masses of people who believe the British Empire is dead. W. C. Nabors, a prophet of British Israel, says, "Let us remind ourselves again that the throne of David which we can now identify as the throne of the British Commonwealth in London was established forever. (II Samuel 7:8-16 is his reference). All talk of the collapse of the British Empire and the removal of its government seat is therefore definitely not of the book. David's throne is as sure as day and night. ..." - Union Jack, Chapter 3

For those who may find it difficult to understand Game Theory, maybe this will help.

Game Theory appears to be built on the strategists understanding of Control Theory as they apply it to social activities. Psycho-Cybernetics is a special application of Control Theory which argues that human conduct is the product of an automated process which is controlled by our individual perceptions or outlook.

Note that cybernetics roughly translates from its Greek origin as steermanships -- steering a ship on course to a desired destination.

It's the business of Game Theory strategists to manipulate our perceptions via a shifting frame of reference (public opinion for example) which they control through the press and other means. That means they know how to manipulate certain types of individuals without even knowing them, by introducing certain stimuli which they know will get a specific reaction from all players, including government agencies, the news media, the victims and the public. The strategists are never directly involved anywhere in the process. We are all defacto players.

Stanford.edu provides some historical examples of Game Theory which should prove helpful.

Global Warming is now a political problem for "world's leaders"

Posted by Bobby
November 29, 2009

Yesterday I wrote: "The public debate concerning Global Warming is over. The new strategy is to move Global Warming to the political arena where votes and influence can be coerced or purchased for a price." Later, the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) announced that it would publish the "raw data" which supported all of it's reports to the IPCC.

Now today (29th), they admit to throwing away the raw data.

"The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building." - Climate change data dumped

A statement on the CRU website said: "We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added data." The "value-added data" is of course, the cooked consensus values allegedly derived from the raw data, but information among the leaked emails implied that even the program used to process the raw data was so poorly documented that the value added data could not be duplicated.

One of my readers just informed me that the Dalai Lama is now calling for a political solution. "The world's leaders must prioritize the issue of global warming above all else".

The email leak was a deceptive move to conceal the fact that the Global Warming agenda will be carried forward in the political arena which the people have long since lost control of.

The public debate is over.

The proof will come out of Copenhagen next month.

1975 'Endangered Atmosphere' Conference: Where the Global Warming Hoax Was Born

Posted by Bobby
December 1, 2009

"Global Warming" is, and always was, a policy for genocidal reduction of the world's population. The preposterous claim that human-produced carbon dioxide will broil the Earth, melt the ice caps, and destroy human life, came out of a 1975 conference in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, organized by the influential anthropologist Margaret Mead, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), in 1974.

Mead—whose 1928 book on the sex life of South Pacific Islanders was later found to be a fraud—recruited like-minded anti-population hoaxsters to the cause: Sow enough fear of man-caused climate change to force global cutbacks in industrial activity and halt Third World development. Mead's leading recruits at the 1975 conference were climate-scare artist Stephen Schneider, population-freak biologist George Woodwell, and the current AAAS president John Holdren—all three of them disciples of malthusian fanatic Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb.[1] Guided by luminaries like these, conference discussion focussed on the absurd choice of either feeding people or "saving the environment."

Mead began organizing for her conference, "The Atmosphere: Endangered and Endangering," shortly after she had attended the United Nations Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania, in August 1974. [...]
Read MORE...

___