Deconstruction of the Modern Social Order
by  Bobby Garner
April 26, 2005

"...We think we speak the English, or French, of today. But our English or French language of today is of yesterday and elsewhere. The miracle is that language has not been cut from its archaic roots -- even if we do not remember, our language remembers, and what we say began to be said three thousand years ago. Inversely language has incorporated our own times, before even we know, the most recent elements, linguistic and semantic particles blown by the present winds." - From the Preface to Deconstructionist Theory, By Richard Rorty (1995)

If we believe familiar words have the meanings which we habitually attach to them, it is fast becoming impossible to continue in that belief. The redefinition of words by their clever usage, must be the preoccupation of every bureaucrat, and politician in government, not only here, but around the globe.

People who saw it as their duty to proclaim the message, "For when they say, Peace and safety! Then suddenly destruction comes upon them.", (1st Thessalonians 5:3) suddenly went mute whenever the Berlin Wall came down on the night of November 9, 1989. The old order, the system, died with that event, but those believer's who looked for it failed to recognize it because it did not immediate usher in the apocalypse as expected. While the accolades of "Peace At Last", were still echoing in the streets, war broke into the news headlines as the first Gulf War got under way and the New World Order was proclaimed. There would be no peace, rather the "instant" of destruction of the system had arrived. The economic "prosperity" of the 1990's provided an easy avenue of denial that the system was actually on it's deathbed.

In fact it was my recognition of the pending death of the system and it's coincidence with the widely proclaimed and celebrated fall of communism which prompted my investigations into the role of deception as a possible explanation for that denial. That instant which began with the fall of the Berlin Wall, is now nearing it's end. On November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall came down. As the most potent symbol of the Cold War, it was the watershed event of the social reform begun by Mikhail Gorbachev. But more importantly, it opened up the prospects for peace for the first time since the end of the Second World War nearly 45 years earlier, and the system was unable to seize the opportunity.

The scriptures say "lift up your heads as you see these things". I saw them vividly, and I knew that "deliverance" was near, but what form would it take? How could I test and verify that the system was indeed in it's death throes? What mechanisms were operating which had the capacity to dismantle an existing social order in such fashion that it would finally, and without fanfare, be declared dead and hauled out for burial?

That's some of the background on my study of deception and the methods by which it may be implemented. It now appears that Deconstruction is one of the primary tools. Especially as it dovetails with the principles of Social Disorganization.

Deconstruction, began as a school of philosophy that originated in France in the late 1960s...

Some words are their own worst enemies. Deconstruction is one of them. Like existentialism, special, liberal, conservative, and post modern, its meaning is often so vague as to be useless. Coined, more or less, by the contemporary French philosopher, Jacques Derrida, the word deconstruction began its life in the late sixties, but it has only become part of the American vocabulary in the last ten years or so. In that time, however, it has moved from a technical philosophical term adopted by literary critics for their related uses to a word that pops up in offhand remarks by everyone from botanists to the clergy. Whatever its original meaning, in its now widespread use, deconstruction has come to mean "tear down" or "destroy" (usually when the object is nonmaterial). - James E. Faulconer

That is to say, the destruction of everything metaphysical which includes every facet of civilized society. All social institutions have in some inexplicable manner, been overtaken and infiltrated by a common enemy from within those very institution which they seek to destroy. It is for that very reason that they are all unraveling at the seams, as is evidenced by the total failure of every attempt to solve any problem from within the system. The "system itself has become the tool of it's own demise.

We are fast approaching the time when it will no longer be possible to deny the agenda that is working underfoot around the globe. Deconstruction, as the essence of Post-Modernism, has come to mean the undermining of the very social fabric which allows it to function, beginning with western civilization, and spreading to the four corners of the Earth. Therefore, it must be seen as a significant element of the plan.

It's recognition during the 1990's is no mere coincident, as it follows closely on the heels of the Counter-Cultural Revolution which itself began in the 1960's concurrent with the development of this "new" philosophy. Aside from the newly acquired meaning attached to the word, the original philosophy itself suggests the mechanism through which the Counter-Cultural revolution might be successful in it's avowed agenda of anti-establishment. It has always been known that the anti-establishment movement was centered around the academic centers of higher learning, our colleges and universities, and now it seems certain that the philosophical circles of academia where organizing their anti-establishment agenda under the guidelines of Deconstruction.

Deconstruction creates it's own defense mechanism by disrupting the opposition; "...those who talk about deconstruction positively often do so in simplistic ways and those who criticize it take the simpletons as representative of deconstruction. One side creates the straw men, the other side burns them down..." - James Faulconer

As Jonathan Culler puts it, deconstruction works “within an opposition,” but “upsets [its] hierarchy by producing an exchange of properties.” This disrupts not only the hierarchy, but the opposition itself.

Deconstruction fits nicely into The Deceiver's Toolkit. According to Derrida, if meaning arises only out of a word's difference from other words in a system, and every word is dependent on every other word for its meaning, we can never pin it down: there is no fixed center to the structure. Meaning, then, is constantly in play, always in motion, and resistant to closure.

There it is then, complete with proper operating instructions. We can all think of examples of how we have seen Deconstruction at work.

For Further Study:
Deconstruction by James E. Faulconer
Stanford Presidential Lectures on Deconstruction

Notice how these statements cripple the underlying hierarchy by “deconstructing” the opposition that it depends on. Deconstruction doesn’t simply reverse the opposition, nor does it destroy it. Instead it demonstrates its inherent instability. It takes it apart from within, and without putting some new, more stable opposition in its place. If you want to really mess with something, deconstruct it.Using Deconstruction to Astonish Your Friends & Confound Your Enemies (In Two Easy Steps!)

Space and Social Theory : Interpreting Modernity and Postmodernity by Georges Benko
Deconstruction, an approach to literature
Fall of Communism, by the Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Department of State

Bobby Garner is a researcher on the phenomenon of One-Worldism with an emphasis on the methods and techniques employed in it's attendant deception without which the New World Order cannot happen. He may be reached via E-mail from http://www.congregator.net/pages/contact.html. He welcomes your comments. Visit his website www.congregator.net This article may be posted in it's entirety on any website provided this statement remains attached.